Lazy R Ranch hosts Fire Resilience Circle with American Farmland Trust

As I write this, it is August 23rd. It is one year and one week since the Gray Fire broke out, burning 10,000 acres, destroying over 200 homes in Spokane County, and burning half of our family ranch. A soft rain is falling, an unexpected late summer blessing. The smell of soil microbes coming to life is intoxicating… a far cry from the smoldering remains that dotted the landscape this time last year. Despite the devastating impact, it's crucial to recognize that the Gray Fire was not just a natural disaster; it was a stark illustration of how human actions—or inactions—can exacerbate such tragedies.

Historically, fire has been an integral part of land management in our region. Indigenous tribes, including the Spokane people, have long understood the role of fire in maintaining ecological balance. However, the modern approach to fire management has shifted dramatically. Since colonization, fire suppression has become the norm, often neglecting the ecological benefits of controlled burns. This shift has led to a dangerous accumulation of flammable materials, particularly in suburban areas where small landholdings often receive little management. An ever-warming climate has led to more frequent and intense fires throughout the West. These factors combined are a catastrophe waiting to happen, largely shaped by linear, reductionist decision-making.

The real challenge lies in addressing these issues on a landscape scale rather than a fragmented, property-by-property basis. Fire does not respect fence lines. We need a comprehensive approach that integrates grazing, forestry, and prescribed burning to manage and mitigate fire risks effectively. When implemented thoughtfully, these practices can help restore ecological function and reduce fire hazards.

Community collaboration is key. We must engage in conversations and build social structures that support ecological maintenance. This is not merely an environmental issue but a social one. Our collective actions—or lack thereof—will determine the health and safety of our communities and the land we depend on.

To address these challenges, we must come together. I am particularly excited about the upcoming Fire Resilience Circle, hosted in collaboration with American Farmland Trust at Lazy R Ranch on October 12. This event aims to foster dialogue among land stewards and neighbors, sharing resources and knowledge to build resilience and address fire management collaboratively. Register at: bit.ly/LazyR2024

The recent fire serves as a sobering reminder of the need for proactive and informed management. While the Gray Fire will not be the last, it offers us an opportunity to learn and adapt. By embracing a holistic approach to land stewardship and fostering community engagement, we can enhance our resilience, safeguard our communities, and ensure a vibrant future for our region.

Insights from the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association Soil Health Event June 2024 – Part 2

Christine Jones shared important information at the Soil Health Event and on the webinars, and I hope some of you took the time to listen to one or more of the webinars Jones recorded for Green Cover Seed.  This article summarizes some of her main insights.

It is important to remember that soil is not dirt. Soil is alive, and life builds soil aggregates, allowing the soil to breathe, absorb moisture, and support a diverse soil biology.  We need to change how we look at the soil and see it as a living system.

Christine Jones's key insights:

1)     Inorganic fertilizers reduce microbial diversity and function, resulting in compaction due to the loss of soil aggregates.

2)     Plant family diversity results in a diverse soil biology, creating a more resilient ecosystem.

3)     There are two soil carbon pathways. The liquid carbon pathway is much more efficient at creating soil carbon than the decomposition pathway.

 Bacteria, fungi, and all the other life in the soil build infrastructure that increases water infiltration and nutrient exchange, allows the soil to breathe and prevents soil compaction. The soil's microbial diversity depends on the plant feeding the biology through root exudates. Synthetic fertilizers break this relationship between the plant and the soil microbes. Plants no longer need microbes to get nutrients, so they stop feeding the biological body. In one study, synthetic fertilizers reduced the percentage of growth-promoting bacteria living on plant roots from 91% of total bacteria to just 19%.  Growth Promoting Bacteria make nutrients available by fixing nitrogen, unlocking phosphorous from the soil, and producing growth hormones and antibiotics.

 Everything is connected. Fertilizers are not poison, but they stop the plant from communicating with its soil biome.  Placing nitrogen, phosphorous, or fungicide near the seed stops the formation of the rhizosheath. The rhizosheath - the link between the plant and the soil biology - has many functions, such as enhancing water and nutrient uptake and protecting the plants from drought and heat stress as well as disease and insects. The rhizosheath also plays a key role in the liquid carbon pathway, which I will cover in this article later.

 A microbial world surrounds us. Remembering that is the key to both human and plant health. 90% of the cells in our body are microbes, and that relationship impacts our health. A plant’s association with its microbiome impacts its health as well. The seed first forms a root, and the rhizosheath forms around the root.  Where does the plant get its microbiome from? It came from the plant, from the biology of the seed, and the conditions that produced the seed. Each plant family has its microbial associations.  We introduce diverse microbial communities into our soil by planting seeds from different families.  Similar biomes compete for the same resources versus a diverse mix of plant families that share resources when necessary.

 The Jena Experiment showed the importance of biodiversity when the test area flooded. The areas with a monoculture of grasses died, whereas the same species seeded in diverse mixtures of plant families survived the flooding. The community of plants shared resources for the benefit of the whole system.  This has also been shown to happen in drought and frost situations. In one field, they had planted white clover and ryegrass. In an adjacent field, they had planted white clover, ryegrass, chicory, and plantain.  The field with white clover and ryegrass frosted, and the more diverse mix did not.

 When they measured the brix on each field, the frosted field had a brix of 7, and the field without frost had a brix of 14.  What was the reason for the higher brix? One possibility is that the higher diversity of plant families provided greater microbial diversity, and the plants could access more nutrients and water for a higher level of photosynthesis, thus the higher brix. The forage with the higher brix improved rumen function and forage conversion. What is good for the soil is good for the animals.

 There are two soil carbon pathways.

1.    Decomposition pathway – the breakdown of complex organic matter – cellulose, and lignin into simpler compounds – microorganisms breaking down residue as a feed source to grow and reproduce.

2.    Liquid Carbon Pathway – from simpler compounds to more complex compounds. Plants excrete root exudates to feed microorganisms. The bacteria and fungi, along with other soil biology, form the rhizosheath around the root system. The fungi hyphae increase the root surface area 5 to 10-fold; thus, the plant can access more of the soil for nutrients and water. Within this community are nitrogen-fixing bacteria as well as phosphorous solubilizing bacteria, actinomycetes that produce antibodies, and protozoa and other microbes that play a role in providing nutrients through the soil food web. This complex biology produces more complex compounds, such as glomalin, that bind the soil together.   The dead microbes also get complexed with minerals to create more stable soil carbon. Plants, through root exudates, build soil carbon 5 to 30 times faster than adding organic matter to the soil. No fungi, no rhizosheath, then no liquid carbon pathway.

 Another interesting fact Christine Jones mentioned is that you build more soil carbon without legumes than with legumes. Too much nitrogen suppresses microbial diversity no matter what the source. With too much nitrogen in the soil, the microbes will work to balance the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and start breaking down organic carbon. Thus, soil is losing soil aggregation compared to building it.  She suggested keeping the legumes at 10 to 20% of the stand.

It is important to understand if we work with nature, she will provide everything the plant needs as long as the plant has a strong connection to a healthy and diverse soil biome. Otherwise, the farmer must provide costly inputs and protection for the plant. Let nature do her work.

 Resources Christine Jones referenced:

New Initatives in Regenerative Agriculture

In 2024, regenerative agriculture has made notable strides, with several interesting developments highlighting its growing importance and innovation.

  1. USDA Funding Boost: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced a historic $1.5 billion investment to support regenerative agriculture practices as part of its climate-smart initiatives. This funding aims to help farmers reduce costs, enhance natural resources, and tackle climate change by advancing conservation practices. The financial support is expected to create new revenue streams for farmers and contribute to broader environmental goals, like improving soil health and increasing biodiversity ​(Natural Resources Conservation Service).

  2. Partnerships and Training Initiatives: Natural Grocers partnered with the Rodale Institute to support the growth of the regenerative organic agriculture movement. The initiative includes fundraising efforts and educational campaigns to support farmer training programs. These programs aim to equip new and existing farmers with the skills and knowledge necessary to transition to organic and regenerative practices, fostering a new generation of regenerative organic farmers ​(Quality Assurance Mag).

  3. Innovative Financing Models: Transitioning to regenerative agriculture often involves significant initial costs and risks for farmers. In response, a report from the World Economic Forum outlined a "breakthrough model" for financing that includes public and private investments to support farmers during the early stages of transition. This model encourages a paradigm shift in farming practices, emphasizing better financial support, technical assistance, and collaboration among financial institutions, policymakers, and the agri-food sector ​(World Economic Forum).

  4. Corporate and Technological Advancements: Major companies are committing substantially to regenerative agriculture. For instance, General Mills has pledged to revitalize one million acres of farmland by 2030, and organizations like the World Wildlife Fund are integrating wildlife markets into regenerative farming practices. Innovations are also being driven by startups like Indigo Ag and Varaha, which work on soil mapping technologies, carbon markets, and strategies to help smallholder farmers transition to more sustainable practices​ (StartUs Insights). These developments reflect a broader trend of increased corporate engagement, technological innovation, and supportive policies to scale up regenerative agriculture practices worldwide. The momentum behind these efforts suggests a growing recognition of the role regenerative farming can play in addressing climate change, enhancing food security, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices.